Movie

Supergirl (2026) is an enjoyable superhero film that is somehow both very generic and very weird at the same time.

The plot is pretty basic. Krypto the Superdog is in danger, and Kara (Supergirl) needs to find a way to save him. At the same time, a young girl named Ruthye is on a mission of revenge. Their paths eventually cross as both become entangled in a conflict with the movie’s villain, Krem. Although Kara initially wants nothing to do with Ruthye, the two end up on a journey of self-discovery that eventually puts them face-to-face with the invincible Lobo, who also has unfinished business with Krem.

I really enjoyed how the film handled Kara’s backstory through its flashback scenes. These sequences were some of the strongest parts of the movie and helped me connect with her as a character. The action is well done, and there’s plenty of it. The movie also does a solid job of balancing its story with the action. At its core, this is a journey about Kara becoming the hero she’s meant to be.

Unfortunately, the script has a habit of spoon-feeding certain plot points to the audience, and there are a few moments that feel either too convenient or simply don’t make much sense. It’s just so damn contrived at times that it borders on being ridiculous. The film also follows a fairly predictable path.

The main villain, Krem, is so cookie-cutter. Just imagine a ruthless sci-fi alien Jeffrey Epstein. He is portrayed straight to a fault and isn’t over-the-top enough to be entertaining, leaving him feeling like a one-dimensional thug. This role also feels miscast. The “evil factor” is already played up to a cartoonish level, so I think the character needed more camp and charisma instead of being so serious and straightforward.

Lobo, on the other hand, nearly steals the entire movie. Jason Momoa was absolutely born to play this role, bringing plenty of charisma and energy whenever he’s on screen. Is he even acting in this role? Momoa is so perfectly suited for Lobo that I genuinely can’t imagine anyone else pulling it off.

I was not a fan of Ruthye. I found her to be a one-note, annoying character who never really grew on me. Unfortunately, she occupies a huge portion of the movie. Her dialogue is clunky, and is poorly written exposition. She desperately needed to be fleshed out because she’s so important to the story, yet she never shows much emotional range.

I really liked Kara herself. I understood where she was coming from, and by the end I was rooting for her. Her heroic arc isn’t conventional, but I connected with it. I was disappointed, however, by how often the movie found ways for a male character to swoop in and save her.

I wasn’t a fan of the soundtrack or score. It never really felt like the music matched what was happening on screen. That cover of “The Middle” by Jimmy Eat World is especially odd. The film lacks the musical glue needed to give many scenes the emotional weight they deserve.

Visually, the film also isn’t particularly attractive. That’s clearly intentional—many environments are supposed to look dirty and lived-in—but I still found the cinematography to be basic and uninspired. It lacks any real visual flair or artistic identity. Like I mentioned in the 3D section, the movie’s bland presentation definitely impacted my overall enjoyment.

Kara’s journey from a drunken depressed loner to becoming a true superhero—both literally and figuratively—is undeniably weird. The tone is all over the place, and on paper none of it should work. Yet somehow it does. I completely understand why some people won’t like Supergirl (2026), but for whatever reason, I really dug it.

There’s an odd charm to Supergirl (2026). Even when I noticed the flaws, I still found myself invested in Kara’s journey and curious to see where the story would go. I was never bored with the film.

Supergirl (2026) ends up being a fairly generic sci-fi superhero movie. I found it predictable and rarely surprising, yet I still enjoyed it thanks to its unique tone and the performances of Kara and Lobo. It’s far from greatness, but it’s also better than some people may give it credit for. Supergirl (2026) is greater than the sum of its parts and succeeds more often than it fails.

Superman

3D Movie Review

By Adolph Vega

3D

I watched Superman in IMAX 3D, and it’s definitely worth it. The film makes strong use of both pop-out 3-D effects and depth-based 3D, adding visual excitement without ever feeling like a gimmick. One of the most fun 3D moments involves a few loose teeth flying toward the screen — playful and effective. A more emotional high point comes when Superman saves a little girl from falling debris — the camera work and pop-out depth make that moment hit hard in the best way.

There’s also a visually stunning black hole scene, where the layered 3D visuals shine, offering a real sense of scale and cosmic awe. For the most part, the format complements the film’s scope and ambition beautifully.

That said, the 3D is not perfect. There are some minor ghosting issues in a few scenes. Certain moments are intentionally presented in 2D, that is when characters are watching TV or looking at phone screens. It makes sense, but it does briefly break the immersion. Also, the film’s stylized cinematography and fast-paced editing occasionally clash with the 3D presentation, making some sequences a bit visually overwhelming.

Still, those are relatively minor gripes. When the 3D works, it genuinely enhances the experience of watching Superman. I’d definitely recommend seeing it in 3D — especially IMAX 3D if you can find it (and afford it). Overall, Superman (2025) makes great use of stereoscopic effects, enhancing key scenes with immersive visuals that pulled me right into the world of Metropolis.

Final 3D Score: 8/10

Movie

Superman (2025) is an exciting, heartfelt return to form. The movie brings fresh energy and boldness to the DC Universe while still honoring the essence of its most iconic hero. That said, it’s not without its issues.

The film moves very fast — sometimes to a fault. From the opening scene, it barrels ahead with little time to breathe or reflect. The pacing feels rushed, and on occasion, important story elements are told rather than shown, which creates the sensation that we’ve jumped into the second film in a trilogy without seeing the first. While things do come together by the end, the lack of background context can be a bit jarring at times. For example, we’re told why Lex Luthor hates Superman — but I wanted to see what triggered it firsthand.

Despite this, the story it tells is surprisingly relevant and emotionally resonant. There are clear allusions to modern-day issues — fake news, immigration, and even allegories of the war in Ukraine — all woven into a narrative about fear, control, journalism, and public perception. Some will no doubt complain that it’s “too political,” but that criticism overlooks who Superman has always been. He stood for truth and justice from the very beginning — in Action Comics #1 (1938), he was already fighting corrupt lobbyists and war profiteers. Superman has always been caring being that connects to the era that it’s set in.

This film doesn’t directly preach, but uses metaphors to reflect on the works that we live in. Topics like the smearing of reputations, war profiteering, the alienation of the “other,” and the power of journalism aren’t heavy-handed — they’re honest acute reflections of the world we live in. The film doesn’t feel like an agenda; it feels like a thoughtful critique of the human experience, and that gives it real weight.

At the heart of the film is a Superman who is struggling. It’s a shocking and brilliant way to start the film. Superman is vulnerable — not just physically, but emotionally. Superman is caught in a storm of PR spin to ruin his reputation. This is a smart narrative that adds tension and complexity without compromising Superman’s core values of kindness, decency, and hope. This is where the film truly shines — it understands the character of Superman, not as an invincible alien, but as a symbol of what humanity could aspire to be. Superman has always saved humanity, but we saved him and gave him the opportunity to be the mightiest hero.

The cast is one of the film’s strongest assets. David Corenswet is phenomenal — he radiates warmth, strength, and quiet humility that makes him feel exactly like Superman should. You understand why the world believes in him, and why this version of Superman resonates so strongly in a cynical, jaded age. The core ensemble is strong, especially the leads, though I do think some of the extended Daily Planet staff could’ve been trimmed without much loss.

Nathan Fillion stands out as Green Lantern — brash, abrasive, and completely entertaining. I especially loved how the film used his powers creatively. His presence adds energy and contrast to Superman’s softer demeanor, without stealing the spotlight. Edi Gathegi as Mr. Terrific also showcases excellent performance and was a surprise highlight of the film.

When the film slows down, it truly pays off. The more reflective, dialogue-heavy scenes help deepen the characters and create emotional weight. These are the moments that anchor the film emotionally and remind us why we care about these people.

Of course, this wouldn’t be a superhero movie without action — and the action here is excellent. It’s frequent, well-choreographed, and visually spectacular. Whether it’s massive city destruction or smaller, character-driven fights, every sequence has a sense of scale and flair that feels distinctly comic book — not grounded realism, but elevated imagination. At a time when many people feel superhero fatigue, this film feels refreshing, distinct, and vibrant. The special effects are superb, and overall, it’s just a joy to watch.

Also, let’s not forget Krypto the Superdog — an absolute scene-stealer. His scenes are equal parts funny, heartwarming, and badass. He adds so much to the movie.

The film’s tone is another major win. The humor feels natural, never forced, and the entire project feels like a confident new direction. It’s not trying to be Marvel, and it’s not trying to copy the Snyderverse — it’s something new. It’s unapologetically comic book-y in the best ways. James Gunn nailed it. I genuinely feel excited about the future of this universe, and this movie does a great job of laying the groundwork for the new DCU — teasing what’s to come without feeling like a commercial.

Yes, I still have a lot of unanswered questions, and yes, some characters and subplots could’ve been tightened — but those are small issues in an otherwise thrilling, hopeful, emotionally grounded Superman film. Superman (2025) is the Superman film I’ve been waiting decades for. It’s bold, wholesome, emotional, and modern, without losing what makes the character timeless. With standout performances, meaningful themes, thrilling action, and a tone that balances heart and spectacle, this is easily top tier filmmaking and one of the best Superman movies of all time.

Final Movie Score: 9/10

Learn more about how we rate 3D content via the link below:

https://www.3dor2d.com/3d-or-2d-ratingssystem/

https://www.superman.com

Supergirl (2026) 3D Movie Review

Supergirl (2026)

3D Movie Review

Written By: Adolph Vega

3D

Final 3D Score: 7/10

Movie

Final Movie Score: 6/10

Superman 3D Movie Review

Superman

3D Movie Review

By Adolph Vega

3D

Final 3D Score: 8/10

Movie

Final Movie Score: 9/10