Superman 3D Movie Review

Superman

3D Movie Review

By Adolph Vega

superman new 2025 movie film poster

3D

I watched Superman in IMAX 3D, and it’s definitely worth it. The film makes strong use of both pop-out 3-D effects and depth-based 3D, adding visual excitement without ever feeling like a gimmick. One of the most fun 3D moments involves a few loose teeth flying toward the screen — playful and effective. A more emotional high point comes when Superman saves a little girl from falling debris — the camera work and pop-out depth make that moment hit hard in the best way.

There’s also a visually stunning black hole scene, where the layered 3D visuals shine, offering a real sense of scale and cosmic awe. For the most part, the format complements the film’s scope and ambition beautifully.

That said, the 3D is not perfect. There are some minor ghosting issues in a few scenes. Certain moments are intentionally presented in 2D, that is when characters are watching TV or looking at phone screens. It makes sense, but it does briefly break the immersion. Also, the film’s stylized cinematography and fast-paced editing occasionally clash with the 3D presentation, making some sequences a bit visually overwhelming.

Still, those are relatively minor gripes. When the 3D works, it genuinely enhances the experience of watching Superman. I’d definitely recommend seeing it in 3D — especially IMAX 3D if you can find it (and afford it). Overall, Superman (2025) makes great use of stereoscopic effects, enhancing key scenes with immersive visuals that pulled me right into the world of Metropolis.

Final 3D Score: 8/10


Movie

Superman (2025) is an exciting, heartfelt return to form. The movie brings fresh energy and boldness to the DC Universe while still honoring the essence of its most iconic hero. That said, it’s not without its issues.

The film moves very fast — sometimes to a fault. From the opening scene, it barrels ahead with little time to breathe or reflect. The pacing feels rushed, and on occasion, important story elements are told rather than shown, which creates the sensation that we’ve jumped into the second film in a trilogy without seeing the first. While things do come together by the end, the lack of background context can be a bit jarring at times. For example, we’re told why Lex Luthor hates Superman — but I wanted to see what triggered it firsthand.

Despite this, the story it tells is surprisingly relevant and emotionally resonant. There are clear allusions to modern-day issues — fake news, immigration, and even allegories of the war in Ukraine — all woven into a narrative about fear, control, journalism, and public perception. Some will no doubt complain that it’s “too political,” but that criticism overlooks who Superman has always been. He stood for truth and justice from the very beginning — in Action Comics #1 (1938), he was already fighting corrupt lobbyists and war profiteers. Superman has always been caring being that connects to the era that it’s set in.

This film doesn’t directly preach, but uses metaphors to reflect on the works that we live in. Topics like the smearing of reputations, war profiteering, the alienation of the “other,” and the power of journalism aren’t heavy-handed — they’re honest acute reflections of the world we live in. The film doesn’t feel like an agenda; it feels like a thoughtful critique of the human experience, and that gives it real weight.

At the heart of the film is a Superman who is struggling. It’s a shocking and brilliant way to start the film. Superman is vulnerable — not just physically, but emotionally. Superman is caught in a storm of PR spin to ruin his reputation. This is a smart narrative that adds tension and complexity without compromising Superman’s core values of kindness, decency, and hope. This is where the film truly shines — it understands the character of Superman, not as an invincible alien, but as a symbol of what humanity could aspire to be. Superman has always saved humanity, but we saved him and gave him the opportunity to be the mightiest hero.

The cast is one of the film’s strongest assets. David Corenswet is phenomenal — he radiates warmth, strength, and quiet humility that makes him feel exactly like Superman should. You understand why the world believes in him, and why this version of Superman resonates so strongly in a cynical, jaded age. The core ensemble is strong, especially the leads, though I do think some of the extended Daily Planet staff could’ve been trimmed without much loss.

Nathan Fillion stands out as Green Lantern — brash, abrasive, and completely entertaining. I especially loved how the film used his powers creatively. His presence adds energy and contrast to Superman’s softer demeanor, without stealing the spotlight. Edi Gathegi as Mr. Terrific also showcases excellent performance and was a surprise highlight of the film.

When the film slows down, it truly pays off. The more reflective, dialogue-heavy scenes help deepen the characters and create emotional weight. These are the moments that anchor the film emotionally and remind us why we care about these people.

Of course, this wouldn’t be a superhero movie without action — and the action here is excellent. It’s frequent, well-choreographed, and visually spectacular. Whether it’s massive city destruction or smaller, character-driven fights, every sequence has a sense of scale and flair that feels distinctly comic book — not grounded realism, but elevated imagination. At a time when many people feel superhero fatigue, this film feels refreshing, distinct, and vibrant. The special effects are superb, and overall, it’s just a joy to watch.

Also, let’s not forget Krypto the Superdog — an absolute scene-stealer. His scenes are equal parts funny, heartwarming, and badass. He adds so much to the movie.

The film’s tone is another major win. The humor feels natural, never forced, and the entire project feels like a confident new direction. It’s not trying to be Marvel, and it’s not trying to copy the Snyderverse — it’s something new. It’s unapologetically comic book-y in the best ways. James Gunn nailed it. I genuinely feel excited about the future of this universe, and this movie does a great job of laying the groundwork for the new DCU — teasing what’s to come without feeling like a commercial.

Yes, I still have a lot of unanswered questions, and yes, some characters and subplots could’ve been tightened — but those are small issues in an otherwise thrilling, hopeful, emotionally grounded Superman film. Superman (2025) is the Superman film I’ve been waiting decades for. It’s bold, wholesome, emotional, and modern, without losing what makes the character timeless. With standout performances, meaningful themes, thrilling action, and a tone that balances heart and spectacle, this is easily top tier filmmaking and one of the best Superman movies of all time.

Final Movie Score: 9/10



Learn more about how we rate 3D content via the link below:

https://www.3dor2d.com/3d-or-2d-ratingssystem/


https://www.superman.com

© & ™ DC. © 2025 WARNER BROS. ENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.


Jurassic World Rebirth 3D Movie Review

Jurassic World Rebirth

3D Movie Review

By: Adolph Vega


3D

The 3D in Jurassic World: Rebirth isn’t bad — it’s just so disappointing. For a Jurassic movie, you expect dinos bursting out of the screen and immersive, pulse-pounding depth. Instead, we get one lonely pop-out and some basic depth layering.

To be fair, a few moments really work: the waterfall scene has great depth, and tight spaces like the convenience store and underground corridor benefit from the 3D, making them feel realistically claustrophobic. The jungle shots are also nice — they lean into that “you are there” nature documentary vibe.

But beyond that? It’s mostly flat. Ghosting issues creep in, and the final act is a dark, muddy mess where the 3D actually makes things harder to see. The potential is there, but the filmmakers just don’t commit.

Jurassic World: Rebirth has mediocre 3D, but it really should have been excellent 3D.

Final 3D Score: 6/10


Movie

Here we go again. Another Jurassic movie. They found YET ANOTHER island full of dangerous dinosaurs. Another group of mostly pointless characters wandering into dino disaster territory with asinine reasoning.

This time, they throw in a “mutant dinosaur” angle to spice things up. And yeah, I’ll admit it — that could have been interesting. Remix some dinos, give them weird traits, create something truly new. But instead? We get a big boss dino with four arms and a head that looks like a cancerous tumor. Cool idea — but they just didn’t do much with it.

And then there’s the plot. Something about dinosaur blood curing cancer? Or something like that ?! Of course, it has to be the blood from the deadliest, biggest dinosaurs. Didn’t we already get this story in a previous Jurassic movie? We’re force-fed exposition and introduced to a large cast of characters we’re supposed to care about — even though we know most are just here to become dinner for the dinosaurs.

So many people magically survive when it makes absolutely no sense. I won’t spoil specifics, but come on…

And that happy ending? Way too neat and way too cute. I can only suspend my disbelief so far. There’s no way all of that chaos wraps up in such a shiny little bow.

What’s weird is that I actually liked the previous Jurassic World movies. I’ve even defended them. They had spectacle, solid pacing, and a sense of urgency. But this? This one’s different. Not terrible, not unwatchable — just basic.

Let’s also talk about the anti-greed moral, which lands with all the subtlety of a T-Rex roar. It’s rich (pun intended) coming from the seventh film in a multi-billion-dollar franchise built on merchandising. Speaking of merchandising — let’s talk about the product placement. It’s like the dinosaurs were sponsored. Why not just put them in Levi’s and Nikes? It’s not quite that bad, but it’s getting there.

The first hour is a nothing-burger of a slog. The film opens with on-screen text dumping a bunch of lore like a Wikipedia summary of a movie they forgot to film. Oh, and don’t worry — the previous movie (Dominion) ending barely matters. But sure, let’s keep name-dropping legacy characters and events, because nostalgia bait is the cheapest way to fake emotional weight.

Yes, the action ramps up in the second half and becomes fun in a theme-park kind of way, but everything falls too perfectly into place. Need the power back on? Boom, it works. Need someone to survive an impossible situation? They do. Convenient plot magic is the real MVP here.

By the end, I was left with 75 million unanswered questions and a mild headache from rolling my eyes for nearly two hours. I didn’t hate it… but I sure didn’t enjoy it either. I can turn off my brain and enjoy a dumb dinosaur movie — and I’ve proven that in my past positive Jurassic World reviews — but this one? Jurassic World Rebirth tested my patience and got on my nerves. It’s convoluted, frustrating, and just plain stupid, and the first half is boring. The movie opens by saying interest in dinosaurs is waning… and honestly, it’s my interest in this franchise that’s definitely going extinct.

Final Movie Score: 5/10



https://www.jurassicworld.com/home/

© 2025 Universal Pictures. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.


Disney's Elio 3D Movie Review

Disney's Elio 3D Movie Review

By Adolph Vega

3D

The 3D in Elio is solid overall, and some moments genuinely wow you, but ultimately it’s hampered by Disney’s reluctancy and ghosting. Many of the space scenes look fantastic in stereoscopic 3d — the layering, the particle effects, the alien architecture — all rich with depth and visual candy. The movie features numerous enjoyable 3D moments, including pop-out scenes and shallow environments that effectively immerse the audience (diorama effect) into the scenes.

That being said Elio is a science fiction movie, but it’s absolutely haunted by 3-D ghosting. Sadly this issue is not just in one or two spots — it’s frequent and frustrating. You’ll go from an impressive scene that looks near-perfect to a blurry double-vision mess that ruins the moment in the next scene. Honestly, Elio has bipolar 3D — and that’s not a reference to the 3D glasses. It swings between fantastic and awful, and frustratingly averages out to be fine overall… when it should’ve been stellar. It’s a shame, because when Elio leans into the 3D format, it really excels. I do not believe this issue with the theatre’s presentation. The 3D trailers before this movie were 100% fine. Regrettably, I believe Disney itself is hindering the 3D potential of its animated films. There’s one scene with a character aiming a gun right at the screen — a perfect pop-out moment — but the gun that’s popping out of the screen is blurred. Why?! It just seems as if Disney deliberately instructed the 3D team to refrain from fully embracing the format. I’m sorry to state this, but if this were a DreamWorks animation film, the 3D probably would’ve been better implemented, and it would probably have received a much more positive review. Perhaps Disney is hesitant to fully commit to stereoscopic animation, perhaps due to concerns about potentially harming children’s eyes. While Disney animated films generally have good 3D visuals, they don’t seem to be fully exploring the potential of 3D. This is particularly disheartening for me, a die-hard 3D enthusiast, as I can envision a version of this movie that would be breathtaking in 3D.

Elio also has many darkly lit scenes, and those are always an issue with 3D. Elio’s 3D is orbiting greatness. Sometimes it’s closer, and sometimes it’s farther away, but it never quite lands where it should be. Elio should have been a 3D showcase, but sadly it’s a disappointment. With a heavy heart, overall I have to give Elio 3D aspect only a slight recommendation.

Final 3D Score: 6/10


Movie

Disney has an uneven record with sci-fi, and Elio unfortunately keeps that streak going.

The story centers on Elio, a lonely boy who dreams of being abducted by aliens — and then actually gets abducted. The aliens mistakenly believe he is the leader of Earth, which (of course) sets off a string cosmic misadventures. It has that rewritten-a-few-too-many-times feel — probably because it was. I accurately predicted a solid 60% of the movie’s plot points. The characters are fairly one-dimensional, and simplistic. I thought the huge conflict in this movie was dumb and poorly conceived. Overall it feels like a short film that got stretched into a feature-length runtime.

This movie provided me with a roller coaster of feelings and tones. There are laughs, but it’s not fully a comedy. One horror-inspired sequence was genuinely hilarious and had me laughing out loud. The movie has heart and even some real emotional swings, but not all of it feels earned. I don’t care enough about these characters to shed a tear, even though the movie is trying to make me (and the audience) cry. Is the movie an adventure movie? Yes. Is it an emotional journey of self-discovery? Yes. Is it silly? Yes. Is it serious? Yes. Elio is the perfect example of a jack-of-all-trades and master of none.

I do respect that the space alien designs steer away from the usual “different face ridges or human with blue colored skin” formula. The aliens have truly bizarre, non-humanoid, non-bipedal designs that look not of this world, but they are also so alien that it’s hard to connect with them. As a lifelong sci-fi fan, I wanted to love that aspect more than I actually did.

The film has two standout cameos that fans of sci-fi will absolutely recognize. I won’t spoil them here, but they fit the movie perfectly— a little too perfectly — like the film was elbowing you and saying, “You see what we did there?” Yet, I had a huge grin on my face. There are also clever nods to classic sci-fi films, which were genuinely fun to find. Unlike the cameos, the sci-fi references in the movie are very subtle. If you don’t know the reference, it’s perfectly fine.

Visually, the animation is colorful, but the art style is forgettable — generic, even. It has the same visual design as Disney’s Strange World, and honestly feels like Pixar / Disney is just recycling assets at this point. It’s not uncommon for Disney to revisit its classic animated films, such as the original Snow White and Robin Hood movies. This video showcases that aspect perfectly, and I imagine in the future someone will do a similar video with Strange World and Elio. It’s still disappointing and robs Elio of a fresh distinct look.

Before I conclude this review, I must mention that this movie includes both a mid-credit and post-credit scenes.

  • Mid-credit scene:

    A basic 5-second moment. The scene is a cute continuation of the story, but it’s not particularly special.

  • Post-credit scene:

    A teaser for an upcoming Pixar animated lizard movie. This ‘trailer’ is skippable and pointless. Don’t waste your time waiting for this scene - it’s truly not worth it.

While Elio does contain a few enjoyable moments, it’s not a movie that people are likely to revisit in the future. I love sci-fi, and I couldn’t love this uneven movie. The premise of Elio is cute, but the execution is entirely derivative.

Final Movie Score: 6/10



Learn more about how we rate 3D content via the link below:

https://www.3dor2d.com/3d-or-2d-ratingssystem/


Official Website :

https://movies.disney.com/elio

© 2025 Disney and its related entities